[Xenomai] kernel 3.12
gilles.chanteperdrix at xenomai.org
Mon Apr 25 21:50:54 CEST 2016
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:38:45PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Lennart Sorensen
> <lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:21:50AM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
> >> We intend to use ipipe with zynq (we already have 3.12.0 kernel used with zynq).
> >> Do you think the patch should be relevant for zynq ?
> >> I see that xilinx have their own patch , but it is for older kernel 2.6.3
> >> http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/Xenomai+for+Zynq#Xenomai for Zynq-7000 AP
> >> SoC Linux--Patch
> > You can give it a try. The zynq does have a Cortex-A9 as far as I recall,
> > so it ought to work. Doesn't mean there aren't other bits that need
> > fixing in the zynq specific code. But maybe there isn't.
> > Just remember it was never an officially supported kernel version.
> > It worked for us, it was given a once over by a proper xenomai developer
> > who did not seem to think it was wrong, but if it doesn't work I wouldn't
> > expect the xenomai developers to be excited to help fix it.
> >> I also see that in git there is ipipe for 3.12.0
> >> http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/log/?h=raw/for-ipipe-3.12.0
> >> But again I am unsure if it is relevant for zynq too.
> > Well that was a work in progress I believe and never officially released
> > as far as I recall. I started from that one, but the one I posted is
> > actually based on the 3.14 patch and backported as far as I recall.
> > It has been a while since we moved to 3.14.
> > --
> > Len Sorensen
> Hi Len,
> We've first tried to apply the patch for 3.12.0 but there were too many errors,
> so we eventually used
> latest commit.
> I hope the ipipe should work without any issues wuth this tree.
> Is there a way to check if ipipe is OK with our version based on this commit ?
Bad idea, this branch corresponds to some intermediate state. I
More information about the Xenomai