[Xenomai] kernel 3.12

Ran Shalit ranshalit at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 22:01:40 CEST 2016


On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
<gilles.chanteperdrix at xenomai.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:38:45PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Lennart Sorensen
>> <lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:21:50AM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> >> We intend to use ipipe with zynq (we already have 3.12.0 kernel used with zynq).
>> >> Do you think the patch should be relevant for zynq ?
>> >> I see that xilinx have their own patch , but it is for older kernel 2.6.3
>> >> http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/Xenomai+for+Zynq#Xenomai for Zynq-7000 AP
>> >> SoC Linux--Patch
>> >
>> > You can give it a try.  The zynq does have a Cortex-A9 as far as I recall,
>> > so it ought to work.  Doesn't mean there aren't other bits that need
>> > fixing in the zynq specific code.  But maybe there isn't.
>> >
>> > Just remember it was never an officially supported kernel version.
>> > It worked for us, it was given a once over by a proper xenomai developer
>> > who did not seem to think it was wrong, but if it doesn't work I wouldn't
>> > expect the xenomai developers to be excited to help fix it.
>> >
>> >> I also see that in git there is ipipe for 3.12.0
>> >> http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/log/?h=raw/for-ipipe-3.12.0
>> >> But again I am unsure if it is relevant for zynq too.
>> >
>> > Well that was a work in progress I believe and never officially released
>> > as far as I recall.  I started from that one, but the one I posted is
>> > actually based on the 3.14 patch and backported as far as I recall.
>> > It has been a while since we moved to 3.14.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Len Sorensen
>>
>> Hi Len,
>>
>> We've first tried to apply the patch for 3.12.0 but there were too many errors,
>> so we eventually used
>> http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/log/?h=raw/for-ipipe-3.12.0
>> latest commit.
>> I hope the ipipe should work without any issues wuth this tree.
>> Is there a way to check if ipipe is OK with our version based on this commit ?
>
> Bad idea, this branch corresponds to some intermediate state. I
> removed it.
>
> --
>                                             Gilles.

Hi Gilles,

Is there any better way to apply ipipe on 3.12.0 ?

Thanks,
Ran



More information about the Xenomai mailing list