[Xenomai] [SPOOF ?] Does it make sense to patch with both Xenomai and PREEMPT_RT?
Marcel Van Mierlo
Marcel.VanMierlo at marel.com
Thu Feb 16 09:49:36 CET 2017
Ah, I see this was largely answered for Ran Shalit's question on Feb 07th.
From: Xenomai <xenomai-bounces at xenomai.org> on behalf of Marcel Van Mierlo <Marcel.VanMierlo at marel.com>
Sent: 15 February 2017 16:42:38
To: xenomai at xenomai.org
Subject: [SPOOF ?][Xenomai] Does it make sense to patch with both Xenomai and PREEMPT_RT?
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
Is it possible to patch a Kernel (3.18.5) with both CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and Xenomai (3.0.2 Cobalt)? Does this make sense, or does the Xenomai patch introduce RT preemption anyway?
We have a real-time pSOS application currently running under a Xenomai patched Kernel (Kernel 3.18.5, Xenomai 3.0.2 Cobalt), and would like to use this environment to run an application which currently runs under a Kernel (3.14.48) which is patched with PREEMPT_RT.
Xenomai mailing list
Xenomai at xenomai.org
More information about the Xenomai