[PATCH 0/2]GPIO Loopback Benchmark Tool

Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka at siemens.com
Fri Jul 3 11:21:57 CEST 2020


On 03.07.20 08:37, chensong via Xenomai wrote:
> In general, we use cyclictest and latency to evaluate the determinism of our real
> time system. As we know, cyclictest and latency use hrtimer to set up a timer and
> calculate jitter by comparing expected wakeup time and real wakeup time.
> 
> Besides that, we can also use GPIO to evaluate more modules in different scenarios.
> In this case, i apply 2 GPIO ports, one is set as output, the other is interrupt,
> at the same time, connect them with a cable. Once an signal is sent from output pin,
> an interrupt will be raised in interrupt pin immediately.
> 
> Timestamps are recorded before gpio_set_value and interrupt handler respectively, the
> diff between them is jitter.
> 
> There is also an RT task running in the user space, which collects the information and
> output the summary at the end of the test. What's more, it also records the timestamps
> in user space, syscall overhead is included.
> 
> Further, Making a little change will enable the tool working with latency box,once a
> signal from latency box is received in interrupt pin, the tool can send a signal at
> output pin as response. (I haven't got the latency box, so this function is not in
> place yet)
> 
> chensong (2):
>    demo/posix/cobalt: App of gpio loopback benchmark
>    kernel/driver/testing: Driver of gpio loopback benchmark
> 
>   demo/posix/cobalt/Makefile.am      |   6 +
>   demo/posix/cobalt/gpioloop.c       | 516 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/drivers/testing/Kconfig     |   7 +
>   kernel/drivers/testing/Makefile    |   3 +
>   kernel/drivers/testing/gpiobench.c | 288 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   5 files changed, 820 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 demo/posix/cobalt/gpioloop.c
>   create mode 100644 kernel/drivers/testing/gpiobench.c
> 

That is a valuable addition! We used to have such an interrupt benchmark 
in Xenomai 2 times or so, using a null modem connection (UART signals). 
GPIOs are more generic, though.

Two things I would recommend doing differently:
  - use RTDM GPIO device (maybe adding missing RTDM GPIO driver for
    your targets)
  - build benchmark not via loopback but via cross-link
     - device-under-test receives truly asynchronous event on GPIO input
     - reacts with flipping some GPIO output
     - can run reaction either in interrupt handler or RT application
       task, to cover more real scenarios
     - latency box can also be a second device that triggers event and
       measures reaction while having interrupts off (that's how things
       worked in Xenomai 2)

The lookback scenario is too synchronous to catch realistic latencies. 
It rather measures the performance of the event path.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



More information about the Xenomai mailing list