[PATCH 0/2]GPIO Loopback Benchmark Tool

chensong chensong at tj.kylinos.cn
Tue Jul 7 10:19:10 CEST 2020



On 2020年07月07日 08:42, chensong via Xenomai wrote:
>
>
> On 2020年07月07日 00:05, Greg Gallagher wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:29 AM chensong <chensong at tj.kylinos.cn> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2020年07月06日 13:59, Greg Gallagher wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:36 PM chensong via Xenomai
>>>> <xenomai at xenomai.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2020年07月03日 17:21, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> On 03.07.20 08:37, chensong via Xenomai wrote:
>>>>>>> In general, we use cyclictest and latency to evaluate the
>>>>>>> determinism
>>>>>>> of our real
>>>>>>> time system. As we know, cyclictest and latency use hrtimer to
>>>>>>> set up
>>>>>>> a timer and
>>>>>>> calculate jitter by comparing expected wakeup time and real
>>>>>>> wakeup time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Besides that, we can also use GPIO to evaluate more modules in
>>>>>>> different scenarios.
>>>>>>> In this case, i apply 2 GPIO ports, one is set as output, the
>>>>>>> other is
>>>>>>> interrupt,
>>>>>>> at the same time, connect them with a cable. Once an signal is sent
>>>>>>> from output pin,
>>>>>>> an interrupt will be raised in interrupt pin immediately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Timestamps are recorded before gpio_set_value and interrupt handler
>>>>>>> respectively, the
>>>>>>> diff between them is jitter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is also an RT task running in the user space, which
>>>>>>> collects the
>>>>>>> information and
>>>>>>> output the summary at the end of the test. What's more, it also
>>>>>>> records the timestamps
>>>>>>> in user space, syscall overhead is included.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Further, Making a little change will enable the tool working with
>>>>>>> latency box,once a
>>>>>>> signal from latency box is received in interrupt pin, the tool can
>>>>>>> send a signal at
>>>>>>> output pin as response. (I haven't got the latency box, so this
>>>>>>> function is not in
>>>>>>> place yet)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> chensong (2):
>>>>>>>      demo/posix/cobalt: App of gpio loopback benchmark
>>>>>>>      kernel/driver/testing: Driver of gpio loopback benchmark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     demo/posix/cobalt/Makefile.am      |   6 +
>>>>>>>     demo/posix/cobalt/gpioloop.c       | 516
>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>     kernel/drivers/testing/Kconfig     |   7 +
>>>>>>>     kernel/drivers/testing/Makefile    |   3 +
>>>>>>>     kernel/drivers/testing/gpiobench.c | 288 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>     5 files changed, 820 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>     create mode 100644 demo/posix/cobalt/gpioloop.c
>>>>>>>     create mode 100644 kernel/drivers/testing/gpiobench.c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is a valuable addition! We used to have such an interrupt
>>>>>> benchmark
>>>>>> in Xenomai 2 times or so, using a null modem connection (UART
>>>>>> signals).
>>>>>> GPIOs are more generic, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two things I would recommend doing differently:
>>>>>>     - use RTDM GPIO device (maybe adding missing RTDM GPIO driver for
>>>>>>       your targets)
>>>>> gpiobench.c in patch2/2 is referring to gpio-core.c in
>>>>> kernel/driver/gpio, they use similar RTDM strcuts or APIs such as
>>>>> rtdm_driver, rtdm_dev_register.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please give me a sample of RTDM GPIO device? or what kind of
>>>>> RTDM GPIO driver did i miss?
>>>>>
>>>> You could add a proper RTDM gpio driver similar to
>>>> kernel/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>>>
>>>> They are pretty easy to add since there's a gpio framework in Xenomai
>>>> that uses some functions from gpiolib.  This commit
>>>> d4416d68082f538cdbf08579f99738adbe80d39c may help as an example on how
>>>> to add a new gpio driver. Let me know if I can help.
>>> i think i understand gpio framework in gpio-omap.c and gpio-core.c,
>>> therefore, gpiobench.c in my patch can be replaced. what's more, a new
>>> file like gpio-bcm2711.c is needed.
>>
>> Is this for the Raspberry pi 4?  Does that use the bcm2835 gpio
>> driver?  We already have that driver if that's the case.
> For Raspberry pi 4b, same with rpi 4? I'm not sure which one. I found
> them both in device tree.
> If bcm2835 is the right driver, no more work to do.

i verified bcm2835, it's working perfectly with rt task in my app(patch 
1/2), therefore, gpiobench.c(patch2/2) is not necessary.

thanks.

>>>
>>> I also looked into /testsuite/gpiotest/gpiotest.c, it's working with
>>> gpio-core.c and read the timestamp of gpio interrupt, however, there is
>>> no histogram, nor reacting to latency-box. i'm considering to add such
>>> functionalities in either gpiotest.c or still in gpioloop.c of my patch?
>>> which one would you prefer?

i prefer to add asynchronous event in gpioloop.c, once received a signal 
from gpio interrupt, send a signal back via gpio out as reaction.

compared to gpiotest.c, gpioloop.c has histogram and ftrace. what do you 
say? If it's ok for you, i will start preparing patch v2.

>>>
>>> by the way, could you please let me know how gpiotest is triggered in
>>> smokey test,i read the code of smokey test and didn't manage to figure
>>> it out.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Greg
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>





More information about the Xenomai mailing list